And even though Nemesis upped the pursuer monster game, Mr. Being on two separate discs meant there were four different ways to play the game.
Even its excellent 2019 remake couldn’t replicate the divergent storytelling. It basically wedged two games into one, giving you two protagonists who go on different paths throughout the world, often times fighting completely different monsters and meeting new characters. It was directed by Hideki Kamiya, who admitted to disliking horror, and pushed the game to have more zombies, more creatures and more arenas.Įven if it’s a bit rough around the edges to play today, it still does things that modern day Resident Evil games haven’t done. It laid the foundation of many series principles, including multiple perspectives, a hard right turn into science fiction storytelling, and the introduction of one, big, persistent monster hounding you throughout the experience. The first sequel is the “Link to the Past” of the series. For now, the sixth game stands as the popular but maligned adrenaline-fueled outlier of the series. It was a game so out of character for the series that the team pivoted hard back to horror for the next sequel. Despite the fact that the game is awful at teaching you its mechanics, it’s a damn fine action game, and a robust evolution of the combat mechanics of “Resident Evil 4,” letting its characters become fully-formed combat experts and zombie martial artists. Still, this title’s low place on the list hurts me. While it was critically lambasted for its departure from horror, it’s still the best-selling entry in the series. The game was littered with quick time events, and its denouement included fighting a zombie Tyrannosaurus rex with a Jeep. It’s the game that took Resident Evil’s cinematic ambitions to farcical, absurd extremes, almost ditching its horror roots in all but name and aesthetics.
This placement shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who follows the series.
0 kommentar(er)
